AI论文

我们将”Queer in AI”作为社区驱动参与设计在人工智能领域的案例研究。我们检查了参与设计和交叉设计如何开始并塑造了这个社区的 program 的过程。我们讨论了过程中出现的不同的挑战，并审视了这家组织是否在 operationalizing 参与和交叉原则方面有所不足，然后评估了组织的影响。”Queer in AI” 为参与方法和理论的实践中者和理论家提供了重要的经验教训和洞察力，通过拒绝等级制，主张去中心化，成功为同性恋社区建立援助和项目，以及努力改变同性恋社区外部的参与人员。最后，我们理论化，”Queer in AI” 的社区如何为人工智能中的参与设计更广泛地做出贡献，通过培养参与人工智能的文化，欢迎和赋予边缘化参与者权力，批判 poor 或剥削性的参与实践，并将参与扩展到单个研究项目中以外的机构。”Queer in AI” 的工作作为人工智能内部参与方法和参与方法的开发研究的实例研究，展示了社区驱动参与方法和交叉实践的潜力，同时也为研究人员开发和使用参与方法提供了挑战、实例研究和深刻见解。

We present Queer in AI as a case study for community-led participatory design in AI. We examine how participatory design and intersectional tenets started and shaped this community’s programs over the years. We discuss different challenges that emerged in the process, look at ways this organization has fallen short of operationalizing participatory and intersectional principles, and then assess the organization’s impact. Queer in AI provides important lessons and insights for practitioners and theorists of participatory methods broadly through its rejection of hierarchy in favor of decentralization, success at building aid and programs by and for the queer community, and effort to change actors and institutions outside of the queer community. Finally, we theorize how communities like Queer in AI contribute to the participatory design in AI more broadly by fostering cultures of participation in AI, welcoming and empowering marginalized participants, critiquing poor or exploitative participatory practices, and bringing participation to institutions outside of individual research projects. Queer in AI’s work serves as a case study of grassroots activism and participatory methods within AI, demonstrating the potential of community-led participatory methods and intersectional praxis, while also providing challenges, case studies, and nuanced insights to researchers developing and using participatory methods.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.16972

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.16972